Origin of the Moon
If the strange location of the Moon itself, then its origin is even more strange. Believed that she departed from us as a result of the fantastic strain in the early history of the Earth (. Commonly called the Pacific dent on this process), but now it's almost no one believes. The main contemporary theories of the following:
1. The moon was formed from the dust and matter simultaneously with the Earth and other planets, becoming our natural satellite.
2. It was a wandering asteroid in space, approached too close and fasten the Earth.
Each of these theories leaves many issues unclear, in particular, that the geological and chemical structure of the Moon is so different from Earth, perhaps, it has a different history and origin. There are so-called principle of Occam Reiser did not unnecessarily produce all sorts of theories, but rather focus on simple, assuming that they are the most true.
But remember, the simplest theory: Earth - it is the center of the universe, fly larvae in piles of debris are the result of spontaneous generation; all UFOs can be explained by ball lightning, observations of flying geese, Venus or sweepstakes. And if Occam Reiser and others like it, scientists say stupidity, the new generation wants to live with the real truth: it will eventually pay for your idiocy have a future society.
I'd like to know who any of you - well, at least privately - considered the likelihood that the Moon was introduced into the solar system the required number of years ago and intentionally "parked" on our orbit?
